Asrock X99 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 80% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160804
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 20 '17 at 08:32
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 84.6 1-Core 112 2-Core 219 78% 138 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 708 69% 568 Pts	64-Core 842 52% 842 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 141 Reflection 151 Parallax 139 115% 144 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 134 Splatting 109 98% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2840 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 301 (B1) Unknown 97 97 43 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 44 45 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 71 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20414663230	87.2% Excellent	Read 503 Write 408 Mixed 413 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 25.6 105% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 97.7 109% 187 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 122%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 126 126 136 (03) Spinup time 155 155 38680068556 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 174 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 859 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 99 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1428 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1428 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 223339937831 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	81.6% Excellent	Read 141 Write 144 Mixed 136 106% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.47 127% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 97%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB 1,326 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2TB free Firmware: APGNW7JH Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 138 138 42978705915 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 659 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 15 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2542 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 240 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1110 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1110 (C2) HDA temperature 133 133 244814774317 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	90.4% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 147 Mixed 137 113% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.41 107% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 121%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB 1,326 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2TB free Firmware: APGNW7JH Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 96 (03) Spinup time 143 143 38683673056 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 620 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2930 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 278 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1039 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1039 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 231929872424 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	88.2% Excellent	Read 166 Write 142 Mixed 127 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.53 121% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 121%
HGST Deskstar NAS 6TB-$250 974 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 751GB free Firmware: APGNT517 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 140 140 42978378226 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1961 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 17 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3762 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 357 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2092 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2092 (C2) HDA temperature 127 127 257699676207 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	83.8% Excellent	Read 134 Write 159 Mixed 123 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.39 4K Mixed 0.43 100% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 120%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60 7,986 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 648GB free Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 81 (03) Spinup time 136 136 51573555815 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2389 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 121 121 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4856 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 501 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2445 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2445 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 240519807017 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64.9% Good	Read 109 Write 117 Mixed 90.2 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.19 82% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB 10,048 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.7% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 23.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 17.4 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 72.5 55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Taichi Builds (Compare 414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Taichi

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	154x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	101x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	52x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	41x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	19x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x

RAM
CL15-15-15 D4-2133 2x8GBUnknownBench 68%, 1,169 samples	12x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 78%, 415 samples	8x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 121% - Outstanding

Total price: $279

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16