Medion Erazer X5377 F/C050

Performance Results


Gaming 112% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 95% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer X5377 F/C050 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151111
Uptime	5.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '17 at 16:01
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 91.7 1-Core 138 2-Core 274 93% 168 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 722 76% 609 Pts	64-Core 729 45% 729 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 168 Reflection 182 Parallax 165 137% 172 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 166 Splatting 112 107% 133 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-00000 256GB 1,578 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5163 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1070 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 95 95 94 (AE) Unknown 99 99 91 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 791 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 49 37 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 95 95 15988685 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13103 (F2) Unknown 99 99 22023 (F9) Unknown 99 99 24160	95.9% Outstanding	Read 505 Write 194 Mixed 264 70% 321 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 37.7 162% 62.6 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 95.3 136% 255 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 105%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2.5TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 112 (03) Spinup time 173 173 38681641309 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 826 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2996 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 444 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5068 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5068 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 214749610016 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	85.4% Excellent	Read 138 Write 161 Mixed 142 110% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.43 4K Mixed 0.41 88% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 97%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 32 (03) Spinup time 236 181 5166 (04) Start/Stop count 67 67 33551 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15671 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1974 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 238 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 153 153 142132 (C2) HDA temperature 122 99 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	63.4% Good	Read 116 Write 105 Mixed 107 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.18 74% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 87%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 586GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 208 192 8583 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3794 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8640 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1345 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 110 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 189 189 34962 (C2) HDA temperature 123 101 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70.3% Very good	Read 137 Write 108 Mixed 130 94% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.51 4K Mixed 0.18 92% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 97%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 529GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 193 141 7333 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6281 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 25827 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2910 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 277 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 154 154 140916 (C2) HDA temperature 123 101 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 26 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	50.7% Above average	Read 83.8 Write 92.8 Mixed 91.9 68% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.14 62% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB KHX2133C14D4/8G Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 23.6 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 23.8 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X5377 F/C050 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X5377 F/C050

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	1x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	1x

RAM
KHX2133C14D4/8G Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB KHX2133C14D4/8G Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 32GBKingstonBench 74%, 20 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $254

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16