Monster ABRA A5 V9.3

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 59% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Monster ABRA A5 V9.3 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER ABRA A5 V9.3
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170508
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '17 at 17:53
Run Duration	102 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	34%
CPU Throttled	59%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Memory 60.8 1-Core 47.9 2-Core 96.3 42% 68.3 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 188 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4590 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 23 Parallax 1.28 1% 8.53 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 1.07 Splatting 2.87 2% 2.04 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 240GB-$76 5,323 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 135GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 4 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4297261073 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 53 51 210453397551 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 21475229702 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 111 (EA) Unknown 100 100 152 (F1) Unknown 253 253 129 (F2) Unknown 253 253 42 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	36.7% Below average	Read 340 Write 174 Mixed 151 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 9.42 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 2.13 26% 9.7 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 92.5 DQ Mixed 4.11 33% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11.1 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 10.9 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ABRA A5 V9.3 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V9.3

CPU
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	34x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	20x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	14x

SSD
Green SATA M.2 240GBWD $76Bench 52%, 5,323 samples	18x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	5x
M471A1G43EB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 42%, 212 samples	3x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 04CB 16GBSamsungBench 74%, 1,043 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $76

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16