Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PT10S
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140819
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '17 at 09:21
Run Duration	101 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Memory 39.7 1-Core 34.2 2-Core 45 26% 39.6 Pts	4-Core 78.8 8-Core 76.1 10% 77.4 Pts	64-Core 84.4 5% 84.4 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Toshiba(1179 FA35) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4501 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	1.65% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 2.38 2% 2.48 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 2.91 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.65% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$62 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 481GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 194 190 1291 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1562 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2893 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1557 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 105 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 184 184 49170 (C2) HDA temperature 100 78 47 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	54.6% Above average	Read 100 Write 90.1 Mixed 87.6 70% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.21 84% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 8GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.4% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 11 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite Pro C50-A Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite Pro C50-A

CPU
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	9x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	6x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	9x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	7x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
Trion 150 240GBOCZ $196Bench 79%, 15,660 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 M471B5273EB0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 44%, 25 samples	2x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	2x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 16GBHynixBench 52%, 476 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16