Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110401
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '17 at 23:53
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 192 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 370 49% 369 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 844D) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.58 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.74 2% 2.09 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5765 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4758 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 53 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 16406959041	83.1% Excellent	Read 510 Write 415 Mixed 424 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 70.6 4K Mixed 19.6 112% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 36 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 19.4 39% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 124%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB 39,407 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 502GB free Firmware: SC23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 49889480 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5811 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 11487375 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 4325 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4983 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 46 571998241 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 63 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 5919 (C2) HDA temperature 33 54 -12884901855 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	67% Good	Read 136 Write 97.9 Mixed 98.9 83% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 0.41 4K Mixed 0.15 60% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF M378B5673EH1-CH9 Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.4% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	159x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	120x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	116x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	73x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	50x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	33x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	20x

RAM
Performance DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GBG.SKILLBench 47%, 77 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16