Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 41.6 2-Core 57.3 43% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 67.5 8-Core 81.8 10% 74.7 Pts	64-Core 71.4 4% 71.4 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6251) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.1% Below average	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 35.9 30% 34.7 fps	MRender 38.7 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 33.7 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB 8,567 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 52.7 Write 54.5 Mixed 53.1 40% 53.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.11 4K Mixed 0.27 37% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 41%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 165GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 34 Mixed 32 43% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.26 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.21 52% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DRAM Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.2 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16