Compaq-presario NM789AA-ABH CQ5012NL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	9.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Compaq-presario NM789AA-ABH CQ5012NL (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON VIOLET
Memory	1.4 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090203
Uptime	16.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 27 '17 at 02:49
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5000+ 5,372 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 40 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 36.9 22% 32.5 Pts	4-Core 46.7 8-Core 56.5 7% 51.6 Pts	64-Core 52.5 3% 52.5 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250 54,392 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 83C2) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	9.04% Terrible	Lighting 10.2 Reflection 12.1 Parallax 2.84 8% 8.36 fps	MRender 13.9 Gravity 10.6 Splatting 13.8 10% 12.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.04% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37 7,072 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 256GB free Firmware: AM00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1300 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3211 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 4745 (0A) Spinup retry count 164 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3211 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 88 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 30 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 25026 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206158888985 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 95 95 2245 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 248 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	50.1% Above average	Read 88.3 Write 86.2 Mixed 86.7 66% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.21 70% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 57%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 133 132 4325 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3089 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16074 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2948 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 103 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3089 (C2) HDA temperature 108 87 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.5% Above average	Read 91.4 Write 91.5 Mixed 89.6 68% 90.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.18 66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 3.1 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 202 20% 202 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16