Asus H81M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-K (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140616
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '17 at 21:07
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1850-$27 342 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 158 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 165 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 34D2) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.82% Terrible	Lighting 5.77 Reflection 8.62 Parallax 1.91 5% 5.43 fps	MRender 8.81 Gravity 4 Splatting 6 5% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.82% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 70GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3705644 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 -38379827754638 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1006 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 520 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 37 49 77312622629 (C2) HDA temperature 37 49 77312622629 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3705644 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3705644 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3705644 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 90194313216 (E9) Unknown 0 0 374 (EA) Unknown 0 0 335 (F1) Unknown 0 0 335 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1516 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1179651	62.7% Good	Read 437 Write 124 Mixed 176 53% 245 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 14.1 114% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 97.7 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 29.4 47% 87.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 509GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 170 2458 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1547 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3837 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1439 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 27 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1583 (C2) HDA temperature 107 100 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	97.2% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 168 Mixed 160 125% 166 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.73 4K Mixed 0.3 130% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 109%
WD Blue 400GB (2007)-$42 1,778 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 85GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3785 (03) Spinup time 174 170 6291 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14924 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 31058 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7288 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 535 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 14924 (C2) HDA temperature 117 94 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	27.9% Poor	Read 53.1 Write 43.6 Mixed 60.2 40% 52.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.27 76% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x4GB 3,879 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 7.8 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 58.9 68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	1,185x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	502x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	491x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	565x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	479x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	168x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	149x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	147x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	91x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16