Yanwei X79

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Yanwei X79 (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170323
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '17 at 09:33
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Memory 85.1 1-Core 57.4 2-Core 146 58% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 561 50% 423 Pts	64-Core 727 45% 727 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 11C7) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.28 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Lighting 19.8 Reflection 15.2 Parallax 18.7 16% 17.9 fps	MRender 16.4 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 20.6 16% 18.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 318 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 96 (A5) Unknown 100 100 8608219372 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 11 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 32 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 51 45 236223201329 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 335011643470 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 543 (EA) Unknown 100 100 1107 (F1) Unknown 253 253 730 (F2) Unknown 253 253 634 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	49.1% Average	Read 486 Write 210 Mixed 126 60% 274 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 22.7 4K Mixed 3.17 41% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 153 DQ Write 90.4 DQ Mixed 4.04 34% 82.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 71%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 69GB free Firmware: AG.1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 139 3916 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 583 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1114 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 391 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032833 (BE) vendor-specific 56 50 44 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 74 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 508 (C2) HDA temperature 99 93 44 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	56.6% Above average	Read 106 Write 91.4 Mixed 96.2 74% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.25 80% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 70%
Seagate USB 320GB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 117GB free, PID a013 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	27% Poor	Read 54.8 Write 70.3 Mixed 9.14 55% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.25 4K Write 1.21 4K Mixed 0.13 46% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 36%
Seagate USB 250GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 82GB free, PID a313 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 66.9 Write 67.6 Mixed 12.2 58% 48.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.22 65% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 160%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1810EC58E8 Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KL9 Kingston KP223C-ELD Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KL9 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	76.4% Very good	MC Read 33.6 MC Write 28.8 MC Mixed 26.9 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.7 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 30%

Raft

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Yanwei X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2697 v2IntelBench 69%, 1,265 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2670Intel $53Bench 67%, 4,803 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	2x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	1x
PH4-CE240 240GBBench 61%, 688 samples	1x

RAM
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 676 samples	1x
HMT31GR7AFR4C HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7BFR4A HMT31GR7AFR4C 32GBHynixBench 79%, 3 samples	1x
EBJ81RF4BDWD- 2x8GBElpidaBench 57%, 8 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $226

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16