Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime7 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 23:47
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 175
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 495
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.9% Very good
Lighting 112
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 176
92% 99.1 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 10.7
33% 46.7 fps
Poor: 108%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 132%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: S8FM06.9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 505
Write 344
Mixed 403
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 10.7
85% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 28.9
63% 128 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 79%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 717
Write 272
Mixed 467
107% 485 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 21
106% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 88.4
111% 199 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88%
Great: 332%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
621GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 74.7
Write 72.3
Mixed 71.4
55% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.39
95% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
476GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 149
Write 137
Mixed 133
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.09
4K Mixed 0.23
64% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 36.7
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.6
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $953
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback