Asrock P55 Pro/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock P55 Pro/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101014
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '17 at 22:47
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 94.8 1-Core 68.2 2-Core 137 62% 99.9 Pts	4-Core 267 8-Core 269 36% 268 Pts	64-Core 268 17% 268 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.80 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.2% Above average	Lighting 61.7 Reflection 67.9 Parallax 60.8 50% 63.5 fps	MRender 73.4 Gravity 59.4 Splatting 53.9 50% 62.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 112GB free Firmware: 1.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 -126289218345420 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4244 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 289 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 25 61 51543605273 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10877 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9477 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9477 (F2) Unknown 0 0 15102	48.6% Average	Read 267 Write 105 Mixed 184 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 21.9 98% 34.9 MB/s	DQ Read 22.8 DQ Write 67.9 DQ Mixed 13 19% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 83%
Toshiba Q300 120GB 1,888 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 65GB free Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 837 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 326 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 676975 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 199 199 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 54 (C2) HDA temperature 73 59 176094707739	35.5% Below average	Read 241 Write 82.6 Mixed 113 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 6.32 60% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 65.9 DQ Mixed 5.38 27% 63 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 87%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTRAN101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8496 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1320 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 26576 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AD) Unknown 195 195 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 291 (C2) HDA temperature 73 64 154619805723 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	59.9% Above average	Read 266 Write 252 Mixed 262 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 19.3 90% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 18.9 54% 114 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0, 0, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15.9 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 11.2 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 57.5 70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P55 Pro/USB3 Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock P55 Pro/USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	19x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	9x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	2x
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	20x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	8x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $139

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16