| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Toshiba Satellite C855 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1 |
| Memory | 0.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131001 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 13 '17 at 22:00 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | POL-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.9%
Above average
|
47% 68.3 Pts
|
17% 124 Pts
|
8% 138 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 7610M
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.932.5.3000
|
2.79%
Terrible
|
3% 3.48 fps
|
3% 3.13 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GOODRAM 120GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
48% 224 MB/s
|
30% 12.3 MB/s
|
57% 114 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
22.7%
Poor
|
22% 7.73 GB/s
|
8% 2.67 GB/s
|
53% 75.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite C855 Builds (Compare 116 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite C855
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples | 23x |
| Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples | 17x |
| Core i3-2370MIntel $272Bench 49%, 10,169 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $130 |