Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 124% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 113% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150930
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '17 at 06:39
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Memory 92.4 1-Core 105 2-Core 208 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 529 8-Core 859 85% 694 Pts	64-Core 1,061 66% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.12 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 177 Reflection 206 Parallax 198 144% 194 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 177 Splatting 128 117% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 190GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10536 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1073 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 53 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 32 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4982004184	95.9% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 406 Mixed 420 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 76.7 4K Mixed 37.6 145% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 97.2 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 84.6 82% 125 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 15050 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1160 (B1) Unknown 96 96 66 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 54 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 37 (F1) Unknown 99 99 28838950619	90.5% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 406 Mixed 420 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 76.8 4K Mixed 20.4 126% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 19.3 64% 140 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 832GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 186 174 5675 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2856 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 14602 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1270 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 190 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 154 154 140488 (C2) HDA temperature 121 112 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	65.5% Good	Read 113 Write 115 Mixed 127 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.93 4K Mixed 0.2 78% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 84%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB 2,298 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 50a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 37.9 Mixed 9.88 34% 28.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.38 4K Mixed 0.16 20% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 1,779 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 39.6 MC Write 42.8 MC Mixed 39.6 116% 40.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 24.5 SC Mixed 18.8 56% 19.5 GB/s	Latency 63.2 63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	228x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	38x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $1,178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16