HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory	21.8 GB free of 24.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120920
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '17 at 20:49
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5440 452 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 62.4 1-Core 40.4 2-Core 79.5 39% 60.8 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 323 29% 243 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3500 426 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 032B) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.45 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 59 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 58 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 61 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 410144756	51.4% Above average	Read 261 Write 209 Mixed 133 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 15.8 87% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 90.5 DQ Mixed 15.5 25% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 124%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 622GB 580GB free Firmware: 3000 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.6% Very good	Read 209 Write 51.6 Mixed 83.2 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 0.48 4K Mixed 0.29 79% 0.56 MB/s

WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB 3,876 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 282GB free Firmware: 0K05 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 72.4 Write 70 Mixed 78.1 56% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.32 4K Mixed 0.47 131% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 73%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 37GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 172 4266 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1574 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9223 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1505 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 22 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1551 (C2) HDA temperature 118 100 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.6% Good	Read 119 Write 106 Mixed 104 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.13 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.53 141% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 57GB 183 User benchmarks, average bench 21% null MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 9.2 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples	21x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples	17x
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples	9x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $144Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	9x
870 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 92%, 167 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
49GBUnknownBench 18%, 1,461 samples	45x
65GBUnknownBench 19%, 1,017 samples	36x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $144

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16