ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion NC197AA-UUW IQ820sc

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hp-pavilion NC197AA-UUW IQ820sc (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Maureen
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081205
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '17 at 09:55
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P7450-$90 2,755 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 35.4 30% 40.2 Pts	4-Core 43 8-Core 48.9 6% 46 Pts	64-Core 47 3% 47 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600M-GS 1,033 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 900F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 4.04 Parallax 0.72 2% 2.27 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 3.17 3% 3.24 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 723GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 199826081 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2967 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 158488668 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2759 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2934 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 52 571867170 (C2) HDA temperature 34 48 81604378658 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 48 30 199826081 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -115173842998627 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1890453976 (F2) Unknown 100 253 183054194	41.8% Average	Read 95.3 Write 50.2 Mixed 21.5 41% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.37 93% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 68%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 1,028 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 800b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Read 13.5 Write 4.03 Mixed 5.18 8% 7.58 MB/s	4K Read 4.19 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.008 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback