Lenovo 20H1004VPB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20H1004VPB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20H1004VPB
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 10 '17 at 15:14
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 189
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 263
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 505C) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7654
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.93% Terrible
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 11.5
11% 11.7 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 8.78
8% 9.46 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.93%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 448
Write 324
Mixed 349
83% 374 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 9.68
54% 22.3 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 10.1
16% 29.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.3
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback