Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus M52BC_M32BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory	8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150812
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '17 at 18:03
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 60.9 2-Core 122 57% 90 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 348 36% 291 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 85F1) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.11.5 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.88% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 9.62 Parallax 10.7 7% 9.62 fps	MRender 8.05 Gravity 7.63 Splatting 8.48 7% 8.05 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.88% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6190 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 572 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 30 (AD) Unknown 100 100 186843230 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 69 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 30 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 43 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3509638	36.9% Below average	Read 286 Write 48.1 Mixed 8.14 24% 114 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 4.48 70% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 79.7 DQ Write 61.3 DQ Mixed 1.79 20% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 135 135 25789530372 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 536 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5350 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 497 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 555 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 555 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 206158692387 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	101% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 173 Mixed 93.7 110% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.22 98% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 231GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 197112144 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1641 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 78 60 70736484 (09) Power-on hours count 61 61 34388 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1477 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 95 95 5 (BE) vendor-specific 65 49 588382243 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 348 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 862498 (C2) HDA temperature 35 51 30064771107 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -71481140683605 (F1) Unknown 100 253 8911329245549 (F2) Unknown 100 253 131832454615859	87% Excellent	Read 155 Write 149 Mixed 33.7 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.32 90% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 112%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 236GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 97 (03) Spinup time 128 128 25790578961 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1837 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 32 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 43853 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1718 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1859 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1859 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 261993332773 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 33 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 22 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 15	42.2% Average	Read 72.2 Write 74.6 Mixed 14.8 39% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.35 84% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB 3,029 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 13.5 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.1 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

CPU
FX-8310AMDBench 60%, 1,697 samples	31x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	14x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	10x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x
SSD 500GBSeagateBench 90%, 1,930 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	2x

RAM
ASU16D3LU1KBGR/4G 4x4GBKingstonBench 42%, 103 samples	5x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	4x
ASU16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 651 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16