Asus T100TAF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus T100TAF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T100TAF
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160714
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 04 '17 at 19:14
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z3735F
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 17.4
2-Core 34
30% 38.9 Pts
4-Core 59.7
8-Core 60
8% 59.8 Pts
64-Core 60.8
4% 60.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 182D) 1,020MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.73
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.69
1% 0.78 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 1.39
1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hynix HBG4e 31GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.4
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 155
Write 71.7
Mixed 101
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 3.41
31% 9.72 MB/s
DQ Read 17.6
DQ Write 7.31
DQ Mixed 3.49
5% 9.45 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
21.7% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback