Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20161117
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '17 at 04:54
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 83% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 117 2-Core 220 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 735 72% 588 Pts	64-Core 955 59% 955 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro W5100 Graphics Adapter 441 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Dell(1028 230C) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.4 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 23.5 16% 22.7 fps	MRender 20.9 Gravity 16.8 Splatting 28.3 19% 22 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KF51 512GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: D07N Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 377 Write 479 Mixed 349 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 37.2 133% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 263 DQ Mixed 67.2 102% 192 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 102%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 13GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 16.6 Mixed 22.5 30% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.45 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 1.26 110% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GR7AFR8N-UH 4x16GB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 52.3 MC Mixed 42.2 129% 45 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 19.2 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 134%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	418x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	386x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	287x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	106x
MX500 500GBCrucial $44Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	349x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	209x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16