Lenovo 1855N6A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 1855N6A  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120718
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '17 at 05:36
Run Duration2179 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 129
61% 98 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 203
24% 184 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 87.8
Write 85
Mixed 79
63% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.35
91% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
78GB free
Firmware: KC65 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 89.7
Write 88.1
Mixed 71
62% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 0.78
4K Mixed 0.62
112% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.8% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.37 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.4
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback