Asus B85M-GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150923
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '17 at 15:36
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 206 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 384 51% 382 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Lighting 42.7 Reflection 33.2 Parallax 39.5 35% 38.5 fps	MRender 39.3 Gravity 40.4 Splatting 38.4 32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 251 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 34 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 61 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 916482780
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 174GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 129 3941 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1495 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7100 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1430 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 78 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 169 169 93099 (C2) HDA temperature 112 101 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61% Good	Read 107 Write 106 Mixed 110 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 0.24 89% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 85%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 1,694 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 351GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 103 Write 101 Mixed 65.7 112% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.2 68% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-009.A00LF 2x4GB 829 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 17.9 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-GAMER Builds (Compare 499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-GAMER

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	128x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	82x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	66x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $421

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16