Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120316
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '17 at 17:46
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G640-$30 3,040 User benchmarks, average bench 48% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 82.8 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 142 61% 99.9 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 139 19% 139 Pts	64-Core 137 8% 137 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 2872) 2GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Lighting 25.2 Reflection 23.6 Parallax 31.7 20% 26.8 fps	MRender 33.8 Gravity 29.5 Splatting 25.2 24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 338GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 92 (03) Spinup time 115 115 17193042118 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4206 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 9 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 16295 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2342 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4275 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4275 (C2) HDA temperature 206 206 214749806621 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 10 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 21	75.5% Very good	Read 130 Write 133 Mixed 79.1 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.38 96% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 244GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 73 (03) Spinup time 122 122 12897222843 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3967 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5178 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3012 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3989 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4014 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 193274904606 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 592	80.6% Excellent	Read 144 Write 137 Mixed 8.91 69% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.14 61% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 103%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 92GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3 (03) Spinup time 141 136 1950 (04) Start/Stop count 81 81 19571 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 1 (07) Seek error rate 200 199 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4450 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4838 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 29186 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 365 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 29 29 515686 (C2) HDA temperature 116 89 27 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 36 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	33.1% Below average	Read 57.3 Write 57.8 Mixed 19.1 33% 44.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 4GB DDR3 Adata 1x4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	23.4% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	248x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	113x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	71x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	57x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	51x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	45x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	17x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $454

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16