Acer Aspire M1930

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M1930 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M1930
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '17 at 04:58
Run Duration	88 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500S 3,031 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 94.7 2-Core 180 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 297 39% 292 Pts	64-Core 293 18% 293 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 85D9) 2GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	5.92% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 7.69 Parallax 6.25 5% 6.87 fps	MRender 9.62 Gravity 6.73 Splatting 8.78 7% 8.38 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 5.92% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 99 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 31 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 67 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 834176508	63.5% Good	Read 269 Write 213 Mixed 218 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 29.6 109% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 73.8 DQ Mixed 52 61% 110 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F6451U67G1600G 8GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M1930 Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M1930

CPU
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	24x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	15x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	9x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	31x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	4x

SSD
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,544 samples	4x
HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 12GBHynixBench 32%, 1,138 samples	3x
T2G88U1-H9H 4GBUnknownBench 36%, 58 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16