| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz |
| Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100504 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 17 '17 at 23:08 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61%
Good
|
51% 76.9 Pts
|
30% 238 Pts
|
18% 286 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.9%
Above average
|
48% 72.5 fps
|
57% 69.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
92.5%
Outstanding
|
102% 457 MB/s
|
121% 45.3 MB/s
|
124% 193 MB/s
|
|
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
98% 131 MB/s
|
135% 1.43 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 533 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
22% 7.63 GB/s
|
57% 70.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 235 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 48x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 40x |
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 31x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $268 |