HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20160714
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '17 at 13:26
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 119 2-Core 235 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 599 62% 496 Pts	64-Core 602 37% 602 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: HP74 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 21920 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 283 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 287499836 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7389 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 280 (B4) Unknown 100 100 326136863 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 572522528 (C2) HDA temperature 32 43 73014444064 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 39 21920 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	59.2% Above average	Read 114 Write 92.8 Mixed 101 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.36 79% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	7.93% Terrible	Read 22.5 Write 15.8 Mixed 14.3 21% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.17 4K Write 0.16 4K Mixed 0.15 22% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.93% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GB 3,229 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 8.5 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 9.6 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	847x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	763x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	751x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1,201x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	370x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	248x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	59x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	56x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	54x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	46x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16