MSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7A58
MotherboardMSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170407
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 12:21
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 255
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 776
76% 625 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.80
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.4% Average
Lighting 51.3
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 47.8
42% 52.6 fps
MRender 73.2
Gravity 51.1
Splatting 66.8
52% 63.7 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,238
Write 1,088
Mixed 1,115
325% 1,480 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 49.7
220% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 563
DQ Write 389
DQ Mixed 209
228% 387 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 243%
Great: 236%
Corsair Force LS 240GB-$110
136GB free
Firmware: SAFC01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 522
Write 306
Mixed 396
90% 408 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 11.9
115% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 56
114% 230 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 86%
Great: 91%
Corsair Force 3 90GB-$242
69GB free
Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 190
Write 84.7
Mixed 108
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 10.6
94% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 92.2
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 29.1
37% 67 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 56%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
629GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 124
Write 139
Mixed 123
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.25
103% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
564GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 145
Write 129
Mixed 127
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.35
4K Write 2.55
4K Mixed 0.21
127% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 1TB
185GB free, PID 10b8
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 76.6
Write 63.6
Mixed 54.9
80% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.24
61% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58) Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z270 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A58)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $850
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback