Asus 1215B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	23.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus 1215B (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK 1215B
Memory	0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 8
BIOS Date	20110617
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '17 at 20:52
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	33%
CPU Throttled	80%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-60 APU 2,297 User benchmarks, average bench 23% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 9.6 2-Core 12.6 5% 11.1 Pts	4-Core 13.5 8-Core 11.9 2% 12.7 Pts	64-Core 7.9 0% 7.9 Pts
Poor: 11% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6290 2,442 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 84E4) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.7.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.86 fps	MRender 0.95 Gravity 0.43 Splatting 1.09 1% 0.82 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 19987918 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 42752104467939 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 815 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 22 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 42 52 68722884650 (C2) HDA temperature 42 52 68722884650 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 19987918 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 19987918 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 19987918 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 34359738369 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6304 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7002 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7002 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10083 (F4) Unknown 99 99 5242921	23.9% Poor	Read 226 Write 125 Mixed 177 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 5.93 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 6.04 21% 6.69 MB/s	DQ Read 19.1 DQ Write 10.8 DQ Mixed 8.64 8% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 73%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 1,824 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 912GB free Firmware: 1402 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 28.7 Mixed 28.9 22% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.29 69% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GB 2,805 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.89% Terrible	MC Read 1.1 MC Write 0.9 MC Mixed 2.3 4% 1.43 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 0.2 1% 0.4 GB/s	Latency 636 6% 636 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 1215B Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus 1215B

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	4x
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	4x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
THNSFJ256GCSU 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 3,843 samples	1x

RAM
SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 36%, 2,036 samples	1x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	1x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 6GBHynixBench 37%, 83 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Very poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16