ECS H61H2-MV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	65.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS H61H2-MV (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130529
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '17 at 19:22
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	1%
CPU Throttled	99%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 188 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 371 50% 371 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Lighting 83.2 Reflection 83.2 Parallax 72.4 68% 79.6 fps	MRender 70.1 Gravity 75.6 Splatting 78.6 62% 74.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00 250GB-$30 3,183 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 28GB free Firmware: BBFOC33P Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 236 236 55834574849 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 10641 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 58 58 18458 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 5471 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 198 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 113897 (C2) HDA temperature 148 148 236224708645 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 152 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	17.3% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 28.8 Mixed 28.8 22% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.26 62% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 31%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 72 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896895156 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2648 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15274 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2634 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2648 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2648 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 231929806888 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	47.4% Average	Read 77.7 Write 87.7 Mixed 83 62% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 0.68 4K Mixed 0.02 24% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 103%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 246GB free, PID a108 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 31.6 Write 26 Mixed 28.6 36% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.18 52% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 85GB free, PID 0569 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 27.6 Mixed 29.3 37% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.17 17% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 78.B1GET.9K00C 2x4GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 15.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61H2-MV Builds (Compare 932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-MV - $189

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	95x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	89x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	82x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	279x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	77x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	20x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	16x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	34x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $276

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16