Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	66.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170406
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '17 at 19:06
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	LVA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 185 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 656 60% 503 Pts	64-Core 944 58% 944 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2357 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Lighting 82.9 Reflection 83.9 Parallax 74.1 68% 80.3 fps	MRender 82.6 Gravity 77 Splatting 75.3 64% 78.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 35659114 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 86689619903693 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 570 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 146 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 37 52 25773211685 (C2) HDA temperature 37 52 25773211685 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 35659114 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 35659114 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 35659114 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 38654705664 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2692 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2319 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2319 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3254 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2555922	54.5% Above average	Read 423 Write 127 Mixed 169 52% 240 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 13.2 95% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 82.5 DQ Mixed 12.2 22% 41 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 73%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44 34,705 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 121GB free Firmware: 3.ADA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 83 125335388 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2363 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 277750113 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5258 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1993 (BB) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 36 454688795 (C2) HDA temperature 27 64 38654705691 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 74 59 243721044 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 698 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	45.9% Average	Read 86.5 Write 73.4 Mixed 67.9 57% 75.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.43 94% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 54%
Seagate ST3320613AS 320GB-$30 12,971 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 42GB free Firmware: CC2H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 44836808 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5349 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 15 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 209255493 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 9869 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 37 3834 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032840 (BD) vendor-specific 73 73 27 (BE) vendor-specific 69 44 56372953119 (C2) HDA temperature 31 56 30064771103 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 33 44836808 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 63604170696055 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1095950165 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3870020765	35.7% Below average	Read 63 Write 61.2 Mixed 55.4 45% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.37 82% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 2x8GB 8,162 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 31.2 MC Mixed 29.4 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 25.6 75% 26.4 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $636

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)