Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '17 at 15:36
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 150
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 333
39% 302 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203
PwrHis(1787 2328) 2GB
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.6.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 48.2
32% 39.7 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 38.5
28% 33.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 492
Write 387
Mixed 402
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 24.2
114% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 39.1
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 68.6
59% 82.8 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
850GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 146
Write 123
Mixed 116
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.17
84% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17
11GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 175
Write 54.6
Mixed 73.2
107% 101 MB/s
4K Read 8.98
4K Write 9.16
4K Mixed 4.34
492% 7.49 MB/s
DQ Read 9.85
DQ Write 9.42
DQ Mixed 4.4
507% 7.89 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR1600D364L11/4G GR1600D364L11/4G GR1600D364L11/4G GY1600D364L9S/4G 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 17.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback