ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion KP351AA-UUW m9263.sc

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion KP351AA-UUW m9263.sc (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Benicia
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	4.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 27 '17 at 23:09
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 71.9 1-Core 27.9 2-Core 55.3 36% 51.7 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 109 15% 109 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT 20,826 User benchmarks, average bench 4% BFG(19F1 0765) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.02% Terrible	Lighting 6.07 Reflection 8.92 Parallax 2 5% 5.66 fps	MRender 8.81 Gravity 4.23 Splatting 6.17 5% 6.41 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.02% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-128V2S-HP 128GB 704 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2C02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4315 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 866 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 116 (AE) Unknown 100 100 32 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (F1) Unknown 100 100 326339 (F2) Unknown 100 100 646216	52.4% Above average	Read 261 Write 145 Mixed 188 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 25 90% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 54.5 59% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 79%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109 43,695 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 474GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 110 108 7500 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4800 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16333 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2700 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 180 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 130 130 210190 (C2) HDA temperature 119 106 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.4% Above average	Read 100 Write 96.2 Mixed 122 81% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.17 84% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 66GB free Firmware: CR100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7616 (04) Start/Stop count 79 79 22030 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 21981 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6469 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 132245 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4 (BE) vendor-specific 71 59 29 (C2) HDA temperature 160 112 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 132245 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	29.9% Poor	Read 44.9 Write 59.1 Mixed 51.8 39% 51.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.34 78% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 44%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 265GB free, PID 1018 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 20.6 Mixed 15.6 26% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.24 43% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.6 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 97.1 41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback