| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 9.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P5N32-E SLI (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20070822 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 27 '17 at 21:45 |
| Run Duration | 86 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Extreme Q6850
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
48.3%
Average
|
40% 59 Pts
|
18% 135 Pts
|
8% 137 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 342.1
|
9.78%
Terrible
|
11% 9.76 fps
|
7% 9.35 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RAID 0+1 931.52G 1TB
868GB free (System drive)
|
177%
Outstanding
|
205% 275 MB/s
|
130% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.7%
Very poor
|
14% 4.87 GB/s
|
15% 5.23 GB/s
|
43% 93.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5N32-E SLI Builds (Compare 15 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5N32-E SLI
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 9x |
| Core2 Quad Q6700Intel $44Bench 44%, 6,294 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 2x |
| GeForce 8800 GTNvidiaBench 6%, 5,568 samples | 2x |
| GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Average | Total price: $240 |