HP xw9400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP xw9400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A1Ch
Memory28.5 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090421
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 20 '17 at 12:46
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Six-Core AMD Opteron 2427
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
41.4% Average
Memory 59.2
1-Core 32.2
2-Core 63
34% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 256
23% 192 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800
Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Lighting 9.33
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 4.09
8% 7.1 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 7
Splatting 5.43
5% 6.83 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S3712 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0C3J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 231
Write 114
Mixed 102
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 8.72
58% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 53.2
DQ Mixed 8.54
16% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 49%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 237
Write 182
Mixed 195
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 13.6
71% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 30.1
DQ Write 99.1
DQ Mixed 13.6
25% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
166GB free
Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 91.4
Mixed 90.2
69% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.41
99% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%
Fujitsu MAX3073RC 73GB
55GB free
Firmware: HPF1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 85.8
Write 85.2
Mixed 84
64% 85 MB/s
4K Read 1.54
4K Write 3.91
4K Mixed 1.03
252% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 65GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.5
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.83 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw9400 Workstation Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP xw9400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback