User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.24% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemRazer Razer Blade R2
MotherboardGigabyte Blade
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '17 at 13:14
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3632QM
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
52% Above average
SC Int 80
SC Float 80.2
SC Mixed 79
64% 79.7 Pts
QC Int 245
QC Float 251
QC Mixed 244
56% 246 Pts
MC Int 389
MC Float 392
MC Mixed 394
59% 392 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M
Gigabyte(1458 6745) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4043
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 29.6
8% 25 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 27.8
14% 26.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 10%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$40
256GB free
Firmware: GH2OA3A0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 73%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16JTF51264HZ-1G6M1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $369Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $231AMD RX 480 $608Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $248Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $34
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $696SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $40HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $133SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback