User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 23%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardFOXCONN G41MD
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110604
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 19 '17 at 11:49
Run Duration370 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium E5400-$52
Socket775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
SC Int 61.6
SC Float 38.9
SC Mixed 48
40% 49.5 Pts
QC Int 66.8
QC Float 46.8
QC Mixed 53
13% 55.5 Pts
MC Int 60.8
MC Float 41.7
MC Mixed 46.4
8% 49.6 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 24%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
1.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 1.4
1% 3.17 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.7
2% 4.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.44%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$26
318GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 59.9
Write 65.7
Mixed 27.9
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.35
97% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 70%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 3.45
Mixed 4.19
8% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 4.87
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.004
18% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 26%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $172Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $136
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback