| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 9.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150515 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 09 '17 at 11:07 |
| Run Duration | 259 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
78% 137 Pts
|
64% 516 Pts
|
50% 810 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Gigabyte(1458 3656) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
|
9.03%
Terrible
|
8% 10.4 fps
|
11% 13 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
71.4%
Very good
|
98% 438 MB/s
|
75% 24 MB/s
|
35% 73.3 MB/s
|
|
|
8.91%
Terrible
|
16% 18.3 MB/s
|
29% 2.18 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
68.6%
Good
|
71% 24.7 GB/s
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
59% 68.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 486 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 228x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 103x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 53x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 40x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 39x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 38x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $1,178 |