Asus UL50VT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics0.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemAsus UL50VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UL50VT
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100301
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 17 '15 at 09:09
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 98%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel U7300
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 13.4
2-Core 19
8% 16.2 Pts
4-Core 18.9
8-Core 22
3% 20.5 Pts
64-Core 22.9
1% 22.9 Pts
Poor: 17% Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Asus(1043 1AF2) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8688
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.38% Terrible
Lighting 0.47
Reflection 0.42
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.46 fps
MRender 0.29
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.42 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.38%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.2% Below average
Read 253
Write 136
Mixed 159
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 15.2
49% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 59.7
DQ Write 53.5
DQ Mixed 26.6
28% 46.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 77%
USB Disk 32GB
27GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 8.38
Mixed 9.25
13% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.03
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.39
39% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 16%
Typical UL50VT Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UL50VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback