Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus H97-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140509
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	May 25 '17 at 15:21
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4160-$79 48,506 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Memory 94.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 192 77% 130 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 270 33% 255 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84D9) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 358.50 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.33% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 4.15 Parallax 2.69 3% 3.6 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.04 4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.33% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 120GB 3,209 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFC12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2732 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 115 (A2) Unknown 100 100 187 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 786467 (AE) Unknown 100 100 24 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 24 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 99 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1941 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2112	75.6% Very good	Read 502 Write 327 Mixed 227 78% 352 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 66.3 4K Mixed 9.73 88% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 42.8 85% 173 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 92%
Samsung HM320II 320GB 2,350 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 54GB free Firmware: 2AC101C4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3598 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 90 70 3260 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7196 (05) Reallocated sector count 84 84 354 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17714 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 1 1 111995 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1491 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 8926102 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 61 171799281694 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 84 84 354 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 99 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 64 (C8) Write error rate 1 1 1307396 (DF) Load/unload retry count 1 1 111995 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 200492	31.5% Below average	Read 53.3 Write 56.2 Mixed 30.9 35% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.28 79% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB 5,300 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.3 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 57.9 69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	376x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	257x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	244x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	192x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	128x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	121x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	66x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	92x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	46x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16