Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '17 at 15:23
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 80.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 969 86% 731 Pts	64-Core 1,344 83% 1,344 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2141 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Lighting 116 Reflection 128 Parallax 0.44 95% 81.8 fps	MRender 96.7 Gravity 95.5 Splatting 96.3 79% 96.2 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 88%
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.4 Reflection 17.5 Parallax 20.6 18% 20.1 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 24 Splatting 17.1 18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 214GB free Firmware: DXT09B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11649 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2829 (B1) Unknown 92 92 85 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 58 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 3 (EB) Unknown 99 99 608 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23783220937	78% Very good	Read 512 Write 250 Mixed 280 76% 347 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 14 107% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 211 DQ Mixed 32.4 87% 188 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 85%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43 14,860 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 2,182 Write 218 Mixed 1,585 290% 1,328 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 99.8 4K Mixed 53 180% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 131 134% 221 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 210%
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 240GB-$160 1,284 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 18GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 102 102 5494200 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 50105088490042 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2731 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 575 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5494200 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5494200 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5494200 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2136 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2231 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2231 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3177	82.4% Excellent	Read 519 Write 282 Mixed 330 83% 377 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 19.8 112% 42.7 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 63.1 102% 196 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 44131360 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 580 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 264692 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 940 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 236 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 65 454295577 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 72 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2241 (C2) HDA temperature 25 40 42949672985 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -61662845468218 (F1) Unknown 100 253 979948305 (F2) Unknown 100 253 4471436485	88.5% Excellent	Read 160 Write 149 Mixed 165 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.24 70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 254GB free Firmware: CC82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 81020224 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5940 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 42814937 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 14831 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2246 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295753755 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 54 4833542175 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 363 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 52 52 97547 (C2) HDA temperature 31 46 -140737488355297 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 110651242451718 (F1) Unknown 100 253 71950295028391 (F2) Unknown 100 253 33862296867374	73.9% Very good	Read 160 Write 97.9 Mixed 121 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.12 60% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3333 C16 2x16GB 109 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	MC Read 36.5 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 32.4 99% 34.5 GB/s	SC Read 23.9 SC Write 38.2 SC Mixed 26.8 85% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $651

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)