ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DA3
Memory	11.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110812
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 23 '17 at 09:28
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU Node 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 62.3 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 150 55% 95.7 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 518 49% 405 Pts	64-Core 1,110 69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4500 309 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 0322) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 309.8 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 1.69 Parallax 0.44 2% 1.54 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 512GB-$500 1,815 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 428GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 4096 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 35251 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 179 (B1) Unknown 90 90 333 (B3) Unknown 99 99 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 99 99 1 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 45 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 101 (F1) Unknown 99 99 229288426366	56.6% Above average	Read 262 Write 251 Mixed 212 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 22 80% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 96.4 DQ Mixed 64 67% 111 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 13GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	9.78% Terrible	Read 20.8 Write 6.37 Mixed 11.1 14% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.44 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 1.1 101% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT125R7TFR8C-H9 Samsung M393B5170FH0-CH9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 Samsung M393B5270CH0-CH9 14GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.8% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.8 23% 8.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback