Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '17 at 03:02
Run Duration	110 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 63.8 2-Core 118 56% 88.3 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 263 30% 235 Pts	64-Core 269 17% 269 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 3967) CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 381.89 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Lighting 49.6 Reflection 46.3 Parallax 41.3 40% 45.7 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 43.1 Splatting 38.4 33% 39.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 19097420 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 122930553951106 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1160 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 665 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 38 51542097951 (C2) HDA temperature 31 38 51542097951 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 19097420 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 19097420 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 19097420 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 64424509441 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9775 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5680 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5680 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7822 (F4) Unknown 99 99 4587556	65.1% Good	Read 497 Write 224 Mixed 248 71% 323 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 19.2 81% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 60.8 72% 124 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 537GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 75 (03) Spinup time 139 139 21493842174 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5984 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 7 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 126 126 32 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17823 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1230 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6012 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6012 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 184684183587 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 8 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3	87.2% Excellent	Read 166 Write 138 Mixed 26.6 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.21 83% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C9-4GAB Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 F3-1600C9-4GAB Hynix HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.4% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 11.3 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	869x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	645x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	439x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	187x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	160x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	120x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	86x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	84x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	55x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16