| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX V2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111130 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 16 '17 at 11:21 |
| Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
49.6%
Average
|
55% 88.1 Pts
|
14% 117 Pts
|
9% 145 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
54.9%
Above average
|
53% 74.8 fps
|
58% 69.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
40.1%
Average
|
38% 169 MB/s
|
70% 22.2 MB/s
|
17% 28.1 MB/s
|
|
|
60.4%
Good
|
72% 96 MB/s
|
97% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
44.6%
Average
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
28% 9.67 GB/s
|
54% 74.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M LX V2 Builds (Compare 216 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX V2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 29x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 14x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $177 |