Asus P5KPL-AM SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM SE  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 09 '17 at 15:23
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5420-$79
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 86.4
47% 70.4 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 171
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X700/X550 Series
Sapphire(174B 0670) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 1.27
0% 0.77 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 183
Write 61.6
Mixed 87.2
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 9.82
70% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.6
DQ Write 58
DQ Mixed 10.7
16% 30.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM SE Builds (Compare 403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback