Toshiba Qosmio X500

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X500 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA QOSMIO X500
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101210
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 06 '17 at 00:47
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220 13,149 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 93 1-Core 67.5 2-Core 105 58% 88.5 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 204 22% 176 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250M 297 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FF50) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	3.68% Terrible	Lighting 4.87 Reflection 5.58 Parallax 2.06 4% 4.17 fps	MRender 5.67 Gravity 3.47 Splatting 2.83 3% 3.99 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.68% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3K87RA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 38 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 41 (64) Unknown 100 100 169216 (65) Unknown 100 100 30336 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 49 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1285 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 38 100 176095100966 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 311 (EA) Unknown 100 100 177 (F1) Unknown 100 100 250 (F2) Unknown 100 100 179 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	28.7% Poor	Read 248 Write 129 Mixed 135 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 9.79 4K Mixed 3.85 27% 8.23 MB/s	DQ Read 94.8 DQ Write 53.1 DQ Mixed 24.3 31% 57.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 88%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52 41,501 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 409GB free Firmware: JE4OA60A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 214 214 55834574849 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 4444 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 16722 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 4431 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 65536 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 262280 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 83 83 172166 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 249109020712 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 24 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	45.7% Average	Read 77.1 Write 82.1 Mixed 79 60% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.15 61% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 53%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 868GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 20.1 Mixed 23.1 29% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.39 74% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 44%
WDC WD10 JPVX-22JC3T0 1TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 24GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 19.4 Mixed 22.5 28% 22.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.21 46% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 9.3 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X500 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X500

CPU
Core i7 Q 720Intel $220Bench 51%, 13,149 samples	49x
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	44x
Core i7 Q 840Intel $85Bench 56%, 1,339 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GTS 360MNvidiaBench 4%, 1,262 samples	53x
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	28x
GeForce GTS 250MNvidiaBench 4%, 297 samples	22x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CF8 2x4GBSamsungBench 29%, 611 samples	10x
HMT351S6AFR8C-G7 2x4GBHynixBench 29%, 370 samples	9x
M471B5273BH1-CF8 2x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 494 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $248

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16