Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120217
Uptime	18.8 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '17 at 00:11
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 84.8 2-Core 161 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 268 8-Core 399 42% 333 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Gigabyte(1458 226C) CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.11.5 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Lighting 28.9 Reflection 26.3 Parallax 31.7 24% 29 fps	MRender 24.7 Gravity 26.3 Splatting 31.2 23% 27.4 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 215504223 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 16346645546373 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 506 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 132 (B1) Unknown 0 0 97 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 45 42952622113 (C2) HDA temperature 33 45 42952622113 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 215504223 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 215504223 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 215504223 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 21474836480 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16586 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10435 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10435 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6042	33.5% Below average	Read 170 Write 76.4 Mixed 68.6 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 56.1 4K Mixed 8.67 61% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 92 DQ Mixed 26.5 40% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 73%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB 7,087 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 352GB free Firmware: 04.05G05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 4 (03) Spinup time 154 142 9275 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2180 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 30 30 51478 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 483 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 88 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 101 101 298352 (C2) HDA temperature 118 96 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.2% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 78.4 Mixed 72.6 62% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.4 112% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 677 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 297GB free, PID 0202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 27.1 Mixed 13.6 29% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.2 58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GBH2X04E99927-15 2x8GB 1,313 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	27.4% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 6.9 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	446x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	358x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	200x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	118x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	35x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16