Asrock Q77M vPro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Q77M vPro  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 01 '17 at 14:01
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 173
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 333
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 20.7
19% 20.4 fps
MRender 25.6
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 17.3
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AXNS381E-256GM-B 256GB
99GB free
Firmware: 263j-HP Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 474
Write 168
Mixed 228
63% 290 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 19.7
92% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 28.6
68% 142 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 85%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 509
Write 328
Mixed 352
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 20.1
96% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 65.8
91% 168 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 110%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63
339GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 51.1
Write 52.9
Mixed 53.8
40% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.37
93% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
160GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 190
Write 115
Mixed 139
111% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 0.52
4K Mixed 0.24
67% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
95GB free
Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 79
Write 75.6
Mixed 72.1
57% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.59
124% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 68%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
21GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 47.2
Mixed 43.9
36% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.37
100% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 49%
Toshiba External USB HDD 1TB
148GB free, PID a004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 26.2
Mixed 27.3
35% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.31
4K Mixed 0.19
19% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5040MM58F9F1600 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/2GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/2GX 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q77M vPro Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Q77M vPro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $503
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback