Asus Z8NR-D12

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	40.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Z8NR-D12 (all builds)
Memory	50.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110810
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '17 at 07:12
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680 2,389 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 62.4 1-Core 60.8 2-Core 120 48% 80.9 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 647 50% 444 Pts	64-Core 1,297 80% 1,297 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1700 2,013 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Nvidia(10DE 049A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.0 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Scorpion Deluxe PCIe 480GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 375GB free Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 414 Write 395 Mixed 423 92% 411 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 10.2 67% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 144 145% 235 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 156%
OCZ RevoDrive 3 PCIe 120GB-$100 560 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 365 Write 100 Mixed 145 44% 204 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 8.37 52% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 83.2 DQ Mixed 40.8 50% 88.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 69%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 248GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 217 (03) Spinup time 234 232 3275 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1993 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19570 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1493 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 370 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1622 (C2) HDA temperature 120 107 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	69.7% Good	Read 129 Write 113 Mixed 87 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.97 4K Mixed 0.46 139% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 80%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB 6,863 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 12GB free Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 234 231 3300 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2288 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 19517 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1490 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 375 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1912 (C2) HDA temperature 119 107 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.9% Average	Read 85.7 Write 87.2 Mixed 62.9 59% 78.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 3.23 4K Mixed 0.47 158% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 80%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 512GB-$233 91 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 449GB free, PID 16b3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 228 Write 150 Mixed 158 216% 179 MB/s	4K Read 3.49 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.52 55% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 12 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus Z8NR-D12

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)