| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Gigabyte B250M-DS3H |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20161124 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 29 '17 at 02:19 |
| Run Duration | 92 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.2%
Very good
|
81% 139 Pts
|
42% 318 Pts
|
20% 320 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.3.3
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.7%
Average
|
46% 65.7 fps
|
47% 58 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
63.3%
Good
|
72% 328 MB/s
|
99% 43.3 MB/s
|
27% 59.3 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.8FAR 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
84.3%
Excellent
|
84% 29.5 GB/s
|
76% 26.7 GB/s
|
67% 59.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-B250M-DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 4,640 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-DS3H - $110
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $91Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 884x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 849x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 564x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 698x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 533x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 327x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $330 |