Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4/3.1  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 25 '17 at 11:25
Run Duration311 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.90GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 167
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 625
58% 482 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 83.5
56% 71.8 fps
MRender 61.7
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 77.5
53% 63.6 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 SATA M.2 240GB-$148
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 480
Write 257
Mixed 244
72% 327 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 22.9
97% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 50.6
78% 147 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 90%
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB
13GB free
Firmware: DXT4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 489
Write 128
Mixed 190
58% 269 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 11.3
101% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 29.2
65% 139 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
202GB free
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
68% Good
Read 123
Write 114
Mixed 77.1
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.92
4K Mixed 0.29
92% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
92GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 59.8
Write 56.9
Mixed 57.6
44% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.14
62% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
76GB free
Firmware: CC4C
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 23.9
Write 121
Mixed 1.62
35% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB
177GB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 142
Write 147
Mixed 32.3
127% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.19
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 53.4
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 42.1
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4/3.1 Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $424
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback