Alienware M18xR1

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Alienware M18xR1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware M18xR1
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 24 '17 at 01:17
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2960XM 863 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 95 2-Core 184 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 461 47% 381 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 880M 2,147 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Dell(1028 048F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.5% Poor	Lighting 31.4 Reflection 33.4 Parallax 40.7 26% 35.2 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 35.6 Splatting 31.3 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7910 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 16 (B1) Unknown 98 98 24 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 55 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 453 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3226245968	43.4% Average	Read 253 Write 125 Mixed 162 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 8.93 65% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 26.6 56% 115 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 73%
Toshiba Notebook SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$117 2,938 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 931GB free Firmware: AUF0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 3009 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2305 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1697 (0A) Spinup retry count 145 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1219 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 34 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 48955892 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 53353 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 253403594783 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 520 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 274 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 747	64.2% Good	Read 137 Write 76.8 Mixed 106 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 9.44 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 5.81 1,456% 12.6 MB/s	DQ Read 30.8 DQ Write 22.7 DQ Mixed 5.47 113% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 22.2 Write 6.74 Mixed 12.5 15% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.58 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 1.24 114% 2.48 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CH9 HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M18xR1 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Alienware M18xR1

CPU
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	34x
Core i7-2860QMIntel $469Bench 62%, 4,317 samples	16x
Core i7-2960XMIntelBench 65%, 863 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce GTX 560MNvidiaBench 7%, 6,267 samples	34x
GeForce GTX 580MNvidiaBench 13%, 434 samples	23x
GTX 680MNvidiaBench 19%, 1,365 samples	11x

SSD
MX300 750GBCrucial $109Bench 89%, 24,471 samples	5x
MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 77%, 2,468 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 4x4GBNanyaBench 52%, 422 samples	10x
HMT351S6BFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 51%, 254 samples	7x
NT2GC64B88G0NS-DI 4x2GBNanyaBench 48%, 68 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $309

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16